Pet Peeve: The Problem with Proofreading
In a previous life I did proofreading for the American Institute of Physics. They published at the time prestigious peer-reviewed physics journals. This was also when I had grand delusions of becoming a writer or editor. After securing the position I discovered why most writers and editors have day jobs. They aren’t paid much. So I opted out after a year, and chose another career path, one in which I actually made money for what I did. And no, I didn’t verify the math. I simply made sure it was copied from manuscript to galley correctly. If it was wrong in the manuscript and wrong in the galleys, I was fine. But I digress. I got pretty good at proofreading, looking at words forwards then backwards (which works for some reason), and comparing manuscripts to galleys to make sure there were no misspellings, extra words, or words missing. But there was also the math. Some journals were math heavy, whi...